Raising Your Next Round Is Harder Than Your Last One. Here's Why. - 8/20/2026

📆 Upcoming Hustle Fund Events

• August 25 – Vancouver, Canada – Batter Up

• September 9 – New York, New York – Batter Up

Wanna volunteer? Join the events team in your city.

Your startup deserves better than a shoebox full of receipts

Building a company is hard enough. Chasing down receipts, reconciling transactions, and panicking every April during tax season shouldn't be part of the deal.

Enter Xero - the accounting platform built for founders who'd rather build than do bookkeeping. It automatically pulls in your bank transactions, tracks expenses, sends invoices, runs payroll, and shows your cash flow in real time, all in one place.

Translation: fewer missed deductions, and more money that stays in your pocket instead of Uncle Sam's. As part of the Hustle Fund fam, you get 6 months of Xero free to get your books squared away, the right way.

📰 Today's Edition: Raising Your Next Round Is Harder Than Your Last One. Here's Why.

You raised your first round. Things are moving. Revenue is growing. You figure the next round will be easier because you've already proven you can do this.

Then you go out to raise and hit a wall.

This is one of the most common and most painful surprises in startups. Every stage of funding has a completely different bar, and what got you through the last gate has almost nothing to do with what gets you through the next one.

Here's how the math actually works at each stage, and why so many good founders get stuck.

Why do early stage investors need 100x returns?

Not because they're greedy. Because the math forces it.

Most early stage companies fail before finding product-market fit. That's just the reality of building something new. So when an early investor writes ten checks, they're expecting most of them to go to zero.

The only way a portfolio like that works is if one or two companies return not 10x, not 20x, but 100x or more. That single outcome has to cover everything else and still leave money on the table for the fund's investors. A 10x winner in a portfolio full of zeros doesn't break even. A 100x winner changes everything.

This is also why entry point matters so much. If you get in early at a low valuation, you don't need the company to become a trillion-dollar behemoth to hit 100x. At Hustle Fund, investing at the pre-seed stage is specifically about finding that early entry before the valuation climbs, and giving every investment a realistic shot at the multiple that makes the math work.

What are accelerators actually hoping for?

Accelerators invest at the lowest valuations of all, sometimes as low as $330k post-money, rarely above $2.5m. At those entry points, to get to a 100x return (before dilution, which can eat 50% or more by exit), an accelerator needs exits somewhere in the $33m to $250m range.

That's actually not an impossible outcome. There are far more exits in that range than above $1 billion. This is why some accelerators have scaled to hundreds or even thousands of investments per year, at those terms and that exit threshold, volume is the strategy.

Here's the part accelerators don't advertise: going through a program, even a top one, does not mean your next round is coming. The top three accelerator programs alone run thousands of companies through their cohorts every year. Not all of them (not even most of them) go on to raise a pre-seed or seed round afterward.

This doesn't mean accelerators aren't worth it. The right program can be valuable. But you should go in knowing exactly what you want to get out of it, whether that's customers, co-founder intros, or specific investor relationships, and check whether that program can actually deliver before you sign.

Why is the jump from accelerator to seed so hard?

Because the bar shifts completely.

Say an accelerator bet on you at a $1m valuation. The math worked at that price even with modest outcomes. A seed investor coming in at a $5m to $10m post-money valuation needs to believe your company can exit at $500m to $1 billion or more to hit their 100x.

Is $1m ARR enough to raise a Series A?

It's a legit milestone. But it's not enough on its own.

$1m in annual recurring revenue is a long way from $100m per year, which is roughly what a Series A investor needs to believe is possible to justify the valuation they're being asked to pay. Most companies at $1m ARR also haven't clearly demonstrated product-market fit. They have some customers, maybe decent retention, but the engine isn't obviously repeatable at scale yet.

Series A investors aren't just buying your current traction. They're buying your story of how you get from here to a billion-dollar business. 

A lot of great companies with real revenue get turned away at the Series A - including $1-3m ARR. This is one of those places where VC math and good businesses don't always align. If you're building something real but not something that plausibly becomes massive, institutional VC may just not be the right capital. Also “plausibly becomes massive” is in the eye of the beholder. 

So what can you actually do about this?

Three things worth considering if you're running into walls.

First, don't over-index on external investors. For most of business history, VC didn't exist. Companies grew on customer revenue, pre-sales, lean operations, and getting cash upfront. That still works. It's harder and slower in some ways, but it doesn't require fitting someone else's return model.

Second, valuation is a lever. A lower valuation doesn't mean your company is worth less. It means you're giving the next investor a better shot at their 100x. In a tough market, Series A-stage companies raising at seed valuations isn't a sign of failure, it's a pragmatic way to get the round done and keep building. If you're stuck, this is worth considering. 

Third, understand the incentive structure of whoever you're pitching. Investors aren't evaluating you the same way a customer evaluates your product. They're asking if this can return my fund? If your business doesn't fit that model, and plenty of great businesses don't, you'll keep getting nos that have nothing to do with how good you are. In addition, this article doesn’t touch upon this, but outside of VCs, there are angel investors and corporates and impact investors who do not have the same 100x goals. They may have very different goals, but finding the right capital for your business is part of the fundraising game. 

Don't waste time trying to convince someone whose model simply doesn't work for your company.

Until next time,

Dunky, the "investor math" hippocorn

🎥 Watch This